Wikimedia talk:Babel: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
update requests (or shared todo) |
m random thoughts + link |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''"Neutral point of view can be realized by juxtaposition of opposite thoughts."'' -- anonymous |
|||
[[Image:Tour_de_Babel.jpg|thumb|Babel tower !]] |
[[Image:Tour_de_Babel.jpg|thumb|Babel tower !]] |
||
<center>[{{SERVER}}{{localurl:Wikimedia:Babel|action=edit§ion=new}} In principium erat verbum]</center> |
|||
== Update requests 15:22, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC) == |
== Update requests 15:22, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC) == |
||
Line 12: | Line 17: | ||
[[User:Aphaia|Aphaea]] 15:22, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
[[User:Aphaia|Aphaea]] 15:22, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
||
== Site navigation == |
|||
Honestly saying [http://wikimania.wikimedia.org Wikimania site] has better navigations than us. --- how do you think ? I am stronly ostinated by a thought non-English pages should have two kinds of navigation templates: one for interlang, one for all major pages in that language. But I have no idea what kind of dispositions will be best. (Top, side, or bottom ...) --[[User:Aphaia|Aphaea]] 19:29, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:29, 13 April 2005
"Neutral point of view can be realized by juxtaposition of opposite thoughts." -- anonymous
Update requests 15:22, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
or Todo ;-)
- Update requests
- Sitemap +Benefactors Cs, De, Es, Id
- Synch requests
- Home Ja, Ko, Ro
- Benefactors; synch to En (need announce on meta TR)
Aphaea 15:22, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Honestly saying Wikimania site has better navigations than us. --- how do you think ? I am stronly ostinated by a thought non-English pages should have two kinds of navigation templates: one for interlang, one for all major pages in that language. But I have no idea what kind of dispositions will be best. (Top, side, or bottom ...) --Aphaea 19:29, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)