Policy talk:Privacy policy: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Kaganer in topic Push for EU standards
Content deleted Content added
→lnncasncas: new section |
m Reverted changes by 86.158.253.63 (talk) to last version by Kaganer |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
== Allow people contributing pictures to conceal camera make and model for privacy reasons == |
|||
ln casm cnsanmsa ncanmacs casmnascmsac nmam asc csamj scamascmkcsa |
|||
casmcsan msacm csamsacm cas njm sacmsac xsamjxsam cas csakmcsa csa csam, csa nmcmacsa 20-0mmgf casmcsacsam pmmcsa poe nmxms opemmm sam,csnmcm,asmcsamc |
|||
When I uploaded some photos taken using my smartphone I didn’t realise that the wikiMedia website would display all the EXIF metadata from the camera. Please can you add a privacy feature to the user account to hide camera make and model information for my contributions [[User:Adrian816|Adrian816]] ([[User talk:Adrian816|talk]]) 14:23, 27 February 2018 (UTC) |
|||
cmcsan scan csa mncsmcsamjsac nxsamcsam 10cmamkcsm csa,s |
|||
:I think that's a technical question about removal of the EXIF metadata from your existing uploads, and about removing EXIF during your future uploads. Perhaps ask [[:Commons:Village pump]]?<!-- ([[:c:Commons_talk:Exif#Privacy|related discussion]], [[:c:Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2005/06#EXIF|related discussion 2]], [[:c:Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2016/06#Is_there_a_tool_for_making_edits_to_EXIF_data_available_on_Commons?|Is there a tool for making edits to EXIF data available on Commons?]])--> --[[User:Gryllida|Gryllida]] 22:30, 27 February 2018 (UTC) |
|||
sa,mcsamcmsamnc 2 mjxcsamcsa mcsa,mcsa acsscanmsca csa scnamcsam |
|||
::If your photo is displayed somewhere and you download it from there, the downloaded file has no EXIF metadata. The problem though is that without the metadata, there is no evidence that you're the photographer. [[User:Guido den Broeder|Guido den Broeder]] ([[User talk:Guido den Broeder|talk]]) 23:47, 1 March 2018 (UTC) |
|||
csamcsam lcsansn casmscamk 3nmkmc,amcsa |
|||
nmmkcsam csa |
|||
== Push for EU standards == |
== Push for EU standards == |
||
| Line 21: | Line 20: | ||
The implications of [[:en:GDPR|GDPR]] may be unclear for our free software, but it would still be helpful if Wikimedia Foundation were ready to answer similar questions. --[[User:Nemo_bis|Nemo]] 06:06, 4 April 2018 (UTC) |
The implications of [[:en:GDPR|GDPR]] may be unclear for our free software, but it would still be helpful if Wikimedia Foundation were ready to answer similar questions. --[[User:Nemo_bis|Nemo]] 06:06, 4 April 2018 (UTC) |
||
: Strongly agree. Unjustified expansion of application [https://www.google.ru/search?q=data+protection+and+street+photography&gws_rd=ssl GDPR is a very dangerous and toxic initiative] for free knowledge world (and primarily for Wikimedia Commons). It is very important that the [[Legal|WMF Legal Team]] investigate this topic and publish a special appeal and lead a public campaign against this expansion. {{Ping|EHershenov (WMF)|TSebro_(WMF)}} what your opinion about this issue? Maybe someone is already working on learning this?--[[User:Kaganer|Kaganer]] ([[User talk:Kaganer|talk]]) 15:35, 4 April 2018 (UTC) |
: Strongly agree. Unjustified expansion of application [https://www.google.ru/search?q=data+protection+and+street+photography&gws_rd=ssl GDPR is a very dangerous and toxic initiative] for free knowledge world (and primarily for Wikimedia Commons). It is very important that the [[Legal|WMF Legal Team]] investigate this topic and publish a special appeal and lead a public campaign against this expansion. {{Ping|EHershenov (WMF)|TSebro_(WMF)}} what your opinion about this issue? Maybe someone is already working on learning this?--[[User:Kaganer|Kaganer]] ([[User talk:Kaganer|talk]]) 15:35, 4 April 2018 (UTC) |
||
== lnncasncas == |
|||
v babnsa bnbsca asncnsa hascn bcsan nacsncsa ncsajnmsac dooopr ncsanm ncsacsa |
|||
]ncasncas o ncsamcsamksca |
|||
mj casmcasm jkm csman m ncasmsac cmasscam 2-0ncnasn cas |
|||
Revision as of 19:38, 8 April 2018
Template:Archive box non-auto User:MiszaBot/config
Allow people contributing pictures to conceal camera make and model for privacy reasons
When I uploaded some photos taken using my smartphone I didn’t realise that the wikiMedia website would display all the EXIF metadata from the camera. Please can you add a privacy feature to the user account to hide camera make and model information for my contributions Adrian816 (talk) 14:23, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- I think that's a technical question about removal of the EXIF metadata from your existing uploads, and about removing EXIF during your future uploads. Perhaps ask Commons:Village pump? --Gryllida 22:30, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- If your photo is displayed somewhere and you download it from there, the downloaded file has no EXIF metadata. The problem though is that without the metadata, there is no evidence that you're the photographer. Guido den Broeder (talk) 23:47, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Push for EU standards
There seems to be a wide push for USA companies to apply the standards of the GDPR worldwide, for all users: https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-facebook-ceo-privacy-exclusive/exclusive-facebook-ceo-stops-short-of-extending-european-privacy-globally-idUKKCN1HA2MN
The implications of GDPR may be unclear for our free software, but it would still be helpful if Wikimedia Foundation were ready to answer similar questions. --Nemo 06:06, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
- Strongly agree. Unjustified expansion of application GDPR is a very dangerous and toxic initiative for free knowledge world (and primarily for Wikimedia Commons). It is very important that the WMF Legal Team investigate this topic and publish a special appeal and lead a public campaign against this expansion. @EHershenov (WMF) and TSebro (WMF): what your opinion about this issue? Maybe someone is already working on learning this?--Kaganer (talk) 15:35, 4 April 2018 (UTC)