Policy talk:Privacy policy: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Raye Ann Harvey in topic Viewing personal information.
Content deleted Content added
Tegel (talk | contribs)
m Reverted changes by Gogogmegogo (talk) to last version by Tegel
Line 51: Line 51:


I've asked in [[Wikimedia_Forum#GDPR]], with not many answers. Therefore, I repeat the question here: '''Does the WMF comply to the GDPR? If so, which is the procedure for accessing the personal data stored by the WMF?'''. Thanks --[[User:Discasto|Discasto]] ([[User talk:Discasto|talk]]) 20:00, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
I've asked in [[Wikimedia_Forum#GDPR]], with not many answers. Therefore, I repeat the question here: '''Does the WMF comply to the GDPR? If so, which is the procedure for accessing the personal data stored by the WMF?'''. Thanks --[[User:Discasto|Discasto]] ([[User talk:Discasto|talk]]) 20:00, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

== Huge, Global, Privacy Violations of Mr. Ljupco Steriev!!! ==

HUGE, GLOBAL PRIVACY VIOLATIONS OF OF LS; BECAUSE HE IS SIMPLY GUILTY OF/BY ASSOCIATION

Started by super vandals antandrus aka a-satan, given to vermont, then spread around to losers, super wikihipocrytes stewbastards like masumzerock100, bsadowski1, tegel, schniggendiller, jon kolbert, trijnstel, radiX, allah (using Lord's name in vain) & others...

YO BETTER NOT IGNORE THIS!!!!!!!!!! There are huge privacy problems of my name going on, reply immediately and permanently punish the provocators like masumrezarock100 who has support of ~riley

commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Projects&action=history

commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Projects masumrezarock100 needs to go, he is huge problem along with xxblackburnxx, hasley but masumrezarock100 has no idea what privacy means and defamation; im warning you, dont allow this guy to prosper anywhere on wikipedoias!!!

This is more than legal note for commons & wikimedia
Respect my time and efforts, eventually you all will have to (especially wales, maher, merkley); eventually you will have to, as your criminal ativity will not go without serious, long term, public, viral challenge that will get rid of all your sponsors and then some:

masumrezarock & others have no right to defame me as i am not grp and if im associated with him i do not deserve to be defamed by him, riley and others; you cant convict somebody by simple association, DUH!!! This wikiscum is violation all common rules of ethical and moreal behavior. THEY NEED TO BE BLOCKED FOREVER!!!!

medium.com/@gogicvikareeves/jan-i-fully-agree-with-you-here-are-more-fine-links-and-true-stories-to-stay-forever-and-will-be-fefb936b54f2

incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:StevenJ81#gog_informed_me_you_kept_the_conversation,_we_appreciate_it,_i_guess

who the hell is xxblackburn to super vandalize talk page approved by burocrat and tegl burocrat is no better than all of the cursed forever global wikidiots aka wikiscum AKA WIKIHOMOPEDOIDIOTS:

incubator.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Incubator:Administrators%27_noticeboard&diff=4671611&oldid=4671546

it's obvious privacy policy does not work on wikipedia that has "very strong privacy policy" HOW IRONIC, this was just recently mentioned on social media and social media will be used against wikipeddoia:

twitter.com/Wikimedia/status/1199039937103818752 twitter.com/wikimedia/status/575206105346797568 meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Privacy_policy

I never had problems with privacy before but wikiscum blocked me just because im associated with somebody, totally innocent but simply guilty by association, do know, you have done me and my family great damage AND THIS WILL NOT GO UNCHALLENGED WORLDWIDE AND WIKIPEDDOIA WILL GET ITS DUE THAT WILL FEEL IT FOREVER!!!!

keep above projcts page just to just delete name, how hard was that? time after time you have proven wikipedDoIa is the place where jungle law only rules, burocrats: you are to give acknowledgement of this proper thread!!!!!!!!!!

In support of/to mr. ljupco steriev:

jimbo whalehole is senile on purpose and hopeless, also chief of staff ryan merkley also did not contribute to anything except vandalized his talk page when somebody tried to inform him of the problem:

en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RMerkley_(WMF)&action=history

ceo simply does not care & it was also deleted:

meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/173.87.170.201 meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/95.88.81.94

wmf_legal was also informed long ago to ono avail, also jan eissfeldt was to no avail to no avail:

es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario_discusi%C3%B3n:JEissfeldt_(WMF)#Privacy_problems_with_en.wikipedia_administrator%2C_lta

meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:WMF_Legal#Privacy_concerns_wmf_legal_dep_needs_to_know_of[[Special:Contributions/181.124.190.185|181.124.190.185]] 20:10, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:34, 12 December 2019

Talk:Privacy policy/header

Template:Archive box non-auto User:MiszaBot/config

error in translation : tags T:109/T110 -> english text is never translated in the local pages

Hi all, wrong tagging detected in the original English page around tags T:109/T110 Text "More on Locally Stored Data" remains in english; why ???

Thank you

Viewing personal information.

I feel Privacy Policy exist for our personal and business information privacy. The lack of concern and properly run area's which can have Privacy the way it's issued in our privacy policy's, we need to implement the known solutions so people and others can feel better no matter where they are or go.

I agree on the "open end" of this topic . listeners should be an option based on, "as needed". Raye Ann Harvey (talk) 19:10, 11 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Edit request - several untranslatable phrases

Template:Edit protected I found 2 spots that are untranslatable. Could you fix this?

1.

{{Hidden
|header=More on Locally Stored Data
|content=

2.

{{Privacypolicy/Right
| content =
<!--T:30-->

misses the "arrow text" argument.

Thank you. Tân (talk) 19:32, 15 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Vinhtantran:  Done though I do have a favour to ask. It seems silly to me that we have repeated "back to top" labels to be translated and it would seem sensible to me that we convert that to a translatable template that we insert and re-utilise. Suggest we create {{back to top}}.  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:23, 15 January 2019 (UTC)Reply
Oh, it is already there. That is a task further to undertake then, though I cannot do it now.  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:24, 15 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

GDPR

I've asked in Wikimedia_Forum#GDPR, with not many answers. Therefore, I repeat the question here: Does the WMF comply to the GDPR? If so, which is the procedure for accessing the personal data stored by the WMF?. Thanks --Discasto (talk) 20:00, 16 August 2019 (UTC)Reply