Policy talk:Terms of Use: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki
Latest comment: 8 months ago by Jmabel in topic Paid Contributions
Content deleted Content added
Tag: Reverted
SCP-2000 (talk | contribs)
m Reverted edits by Somsong444 (talk) to last revision by Quiddity (WMF)
Tag: Rollback
Line 1: Line 1:
{{archives}}
== Somsong Phoophom(SA)==
Somsong Phoophom(SA)


== Approval for the Wikimedia Foundation’s Revised Terms of Use ==
ประกาศ ยกเลิกใช้คำว่า ผู้แทนพระองค์ จะกำหนดขึ้นมาโดยใคร หรือ อย่างไร ไม่มีประโยชน์อะไรต่อประเทศชาติ และไม่สามารถกระทำสิ่งใดๆได้ให้เจริญก้าวหน้า ซ้ำแต่จะเป็นหานะการล่มสลายของมนุษย์ทั้งโลก และรวมทั้งยกเลิก ให้มีการเลือกตั้ง ยกเลิกพรรคการเมืองทุกพรรค เพราะทุกสิ่งทุกอย่างไม่ใช่ความจริง ไม่มีสิ่งใดที่จะนำพาไปสู่ความเจริญก้าวหน้าได้แม๊แต่นิดเดียว ถึงกระนั้น ถ้าว่าผู้ใดเป็นผู้ที่บริหารทรัพยากร ทรัพย์สินของเรา ไม่มีความสำเร็จใดๆ ไม่มีความถูกต้อง ทรัพยากรมากมายแต่สร้างความเสียหาย ความเดือดร้อนให้ทุกๆคนได้รับรู้จากผลกระทบที่เกิดขึ้น ไม่สามารถที่ใช้คำแก้ตัวทั้งสิ้น เราให้สิทธิ์ได้ใช้ชีวิต ได้ใช้ทรัพยากรทุกอย่าง แล้วถ้าว่าประชาชนพลเมืองทั่วทั้งประเทศ ทั่วทั้งโลก ทุกคนคิดว่ามันดีที่สุดแล้วหรือ เราจะปกป้องหรือรักษาได้อย่างไรในเมื่อทุกอย่างเป็นของเรา แต่ทุกคนมีหน้าที่รับผิดชอบและปกป้องให้สืบเนื่องไปจนชีวิตจะหาไม่ วันที่ 19/09/2023 พระมหากษัตริย์พระบาทสมเด็จพระเจ้าอยู่หัว สมทรง ภูพรมมหาราช(SA)

Announcement to cancel the use of the word His Majesty's representative It will be determined by whom or how it will be of no benefit to the country. and unable to do anything to progress Again, it will be the downfall of the entire human world. and including cancellation Let there be an election. Abolish all political parties Because everything is not true. There is nothing that can lead to even the slightest bit of progress. However, if anyone manages resources our property There were no successes. There is no accuracy. Lots of resources but causes damage. Suffering for everyone to know from the effects that have occurred. Unable to use any excuses. We give you the right to live your life. Every resource was used. And if citizens all over the country and all over the world, everyone thinks it's the best? How can we protect or preserve it when everything is ours? But everyone has a responsibility and protection to continue until the end of their lives. Date: 19/09/2023 His Majesty King Somsong Bhuprom the Great (SA)
Under the Board Resolution: [[Resolution:Delegation of policy-making authority|Delegation of Policy-Making Authority]], the Wikimedia Board of Trustees delegated the authority to adopt, alter, and revoke policies to the Executive Director (Chief Executive Officer), who may further delegate such authority to the Wikimedia staff as they deem appropriate. We confirm that the update, posted on June 1, 2023 to become effective June 7, 2023, was approved by the Executive Director and General Counsel. [[User:RStallman (WMF)|RStallman (WMF)]] ([[User talk:RStallman (WMF)|talk]]) 22:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
{{

|
:Thank you, this is approved. [[User:MIskander-WMF|MIskander-WMF]] ([[User talk:MIskander-WMF|talk]]) 20:59, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
|
:I'm confirming that the revised Terms of Use were approved under the delegation resolution on on May 23, 2023. [[User:Slaporte (WMF)|Slaporte (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Slaporte (WMF)|talk]]) 15:30, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
|ชื่อ = พระบาทสมเด็จพระเจ้าอยู่หัวสมทรง ภูพรมมหาราช

|เกิดวันที่=8 May 1985
== Incorrect numbering of API Terms section ==
|เพศ=พระบาทสมเด็จพระเจ้าอยู่หัว
{{edit request|answered=yes}}
|
Hello, the "13. API Terms" section is likely incorrectly numbered, given that it is directly after "11. Resolutions and Project Policies" and directly before "13. Termination". The [[meta:Wikimedia Foundation Legal department/2023 ToU updates/Proposed update#12. API Terms|draft version]] titles it "12. API Terms". [[User:Coolclawcat|Coolclawcat]] ([[User talk:Coolclawcat|talk]]) 04:09, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
|

}}
:{{done}} thank you! [[User:RamzyM (WMF)|RamzyM (WMF)]] ([[User talk:RamzyM (WMF)|talk]]) 15:30, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

== Official announcement ==

I have not seen any official announcement on wikimediafoundation.org and maillist about the updated ToU become effective June 7, 2023. Any announcement will be published? Thanks. [[User:SCP-2000|SCP-2000]] ([[User talk:SCP-2000|talk]]) 01:35, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

:Great question. A Diff post about what the CC 4.0 piece means to users is being prepared to go out either possibly the week after next. There's a slight wait on that because some of the technical changes for CC4.0 still need to propagate because of server update schedules. That would also be one place the effective date would be mentioned.
:I can't fully confirm where-else it may be mentioned. But to try to address @[[User:William Graham|William Graham]], I don't think it will be mentioned in a banner or all-user-notification.
:Finally, I'll look into your bullet points on "broken" things. It may be one of those things that still hasn't propagated, but just as likely, it may be simple error. I'll investigate within the next day or two. [[User:SSpalding (WMF)|SSpalding (WMF)]] ([[User talk:SSpalding (WMF)|talk]]) 19:55, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
::Just following on Shaun's note above. Yes, there will be a note going out shortly to wikimediaannounce-l. The community discussion and the draft final update that was proposed for the approvals listed here are also [[metawiki:Wikimedia_Foundation_Legal_department/2023_ToU_updates|available on meta where we were holding the consultation]]. - [[User:Jrogers (WMF)|Jrogers (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Jrogers (WMF)|talk]]) 20:48, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
I came here to ask the same question. I noticed page edits on WM projects now state a CC BY-SA 4.0 license. Will there be notifications on all project sites?
I will also note some broken things on Commons:
* the edit page has a red link to the CC 4.0 license.
* [[Commons:Ownership of pages and files]] refers to the 3.0 license.
-- [[User:William Graham|William Graham]] ([[User talk:William Graham|talk]]) 01:53, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

== None changed content with CC-BY-SA 3.0 ==

Hi
If I create the context under CC-BY-SA 3.0, so the identical content (none change[1]) You don't can share under CC-BY-SA 4.0.
Ok, maybe, You can use the fair-use, but what, when the country is not fair-use?
Are you storing the data in none-fair-use legislative countries?
Dušan Kreheľ
[1] But with append space would be then the adaptation.<br> [[User:Dušan Kreheľ|Dušan Kreheľ]] ([[User talk:Dušan Kreheľ|talk]]) 10:09, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

:@[[User:Dušan Kreheľ|Dušan Kreheľ]]: FYI: [[:m:Terms of use/Creative Commons 4.0/Legal note#Mechanism for the upgrade]]. [[User:SCP-2000|SCP-2000]] ([[User talk:SCP-2000|talk]]) 16:47, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
::@[[User:SCP-2000|SCP-2000]]: I know. My last edit of page [[:m:User:Dušan_Kreheľ]] was under CC BY-SA 3.0. So why [[:m:User:Dušan_Kreheľ?export=raw]] is under CC BY-SA 4.0? That would be under CC BY-SA 3.0. Why not so? You look u [[:de:Wikipedia:Kurier]] and section "Wenn CC BY-SA 3.0 → CC BY-SA 4.0 verboten ist".
::You link write about adaptations, but about none original unchanges pages. [[User:Dušan Kreheľ|Dušan Kreheľ]] ([[User talk:Dušan Kreheľ|talk]]) 17:47, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

== [Report] Detect violations of CC BY-SA 3.0 in WMF projects ==

I would like inform about the report a violation of the CC BY-SA 3.0 license in projects[1] of the WMF Foundation[2]. This state was created by the process of changing the license from CC BY-SA 3.0 to CC BY-SA 4.0. The violation report is available at: https://krehel.sk/Porusovanie_CC_BY-SA_3.0/ (Slovak).

[1] https://www.wikipedia.org/<br>
[2] https://wikimediafoundation.org/

P.S.: The report was reported to legal@wikimedia.org.<br> [[User:Dušan Kreheľ|Dušan Kreheľ]] ([[User talk:Dušan Kreheľ|talk]]) 21:20, 10 June 2023 (UTC), --[[User:Dušan Kreheľ|Dušan Kreheľ]] ([[User talk:Dušan Kreheľ|talk]]) 07:40, 16 June 2023 (UTC), --[[User:Dušan Kreheľ|Dušan Kreheľ]] ([[User talk:Dušan Kreheľ|talk]]) 07:42, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

:See [[m:Terms of use/Creative Commons 4.0/FAQ#How can we "upgrade" the license?]]: ''Revisions of pages before the upgrade to the 4.0 version will continue to be available under the version 3.0 of the license.'' [[User:Tranminh360|Tranminh360]] ([[User talk:Tranminh360|talk]]) 13:20, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
::@[[User:Tranminh360|Tranminh360]]: It is not stated anywhere in writing with the licensed content as far as I know. [[User:Dušan Kreheľ|Dušan Kreheľ]] ([[User talk:Dušan Kreheľ|talk]]) 13:44, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

== Broken link ==

{{Edit request|answered=yes}}
I think the link for Robot policy should point to [[wikitech:Robot policy]], [[wikitech:Robot Policy]] does not exist. --[[User:Ameisenigel|Ameisenigel]] ([[User talk:Ameisenigel|talk]]) 20:03, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

:Good catch! Thank you! Link updated. --[[User:GVarnum-WMF|Gregory Varnum (Wikimedia Foundation) [he/him]]] ([[User talk:GVarnum-WMF|talk]]) 21:36, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

== [Report] Detect violations of GFDL in WMF projects ==

I would like inform about the report a violation of the GFDL license in projects[1] of the WMF Foundation[2]. The violation report is available at: https://krehel.sk/krehel.sk/Porusovanie_GFDL/ (Slovak).

<p>[1] https://www.wikipedia.org/<br>
[2] https://wikimediafoundation.org/</p> [[User:Dušan Kreheľ|Dušan Kreheľ]] ([[User talk:Dušan Kreheľ|talk]]) 07:42, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

== [Article] Fixing violations of CC BY-SA 3.0 and GFDL licenses" (Slovak) ==

A new document was created, which is less "legal" and more "practical". It is about "[http://krehel.sk/Oprava_poruseni_licencii_CC_BY-SA_a_GFDL/ Fixing violations of CC BY-SA 3.0 and GFDL licenses]" (Slovak). [[User:Dušan Kreheľ|Dušan Kreheľ]] ([[User talk:Dušan Kreheľ|talk]]) 07:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

== Paid Contributions ==

Can we get (or is there already) a redirect to [[Policy:Terms of Use#paid-contrib-disclosure]], which could be handled as an interwiki link from {{Q|4663309}}? Please ping me if replying, I don't maintain a watchlist on this wiki. - [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] ([[User talk:Jmabel|talk]]) 01:53, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:57, 19 September 2023


Archives
1, 2, 3

Approval for the Wikimedia Foundation’s Revised Terms of Use

Under the Board Resolution: Delegation of Policy-Making Authority, the Wikimedia Board of Trustees delegated the authority to adopt, alter, and revoke policies to the Executive Director (Chief Executive Officer), who may further delegate such authority to the Wikimedia staff as they deem appropriate. We confirm that the update, posted on June 1, 2023 to become effective June 7, 2023, was approved by the Executive Director and General Counsel. RStallman (WMF) (talk) 22:46, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, this is approved. MIskander-WMF (talk) 20:59, 6 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
I'm confirming that the revised Terms of Use were approved under the delegation resolution on on May 23, 2023. Slaporte (WMF) (talk) 15:30, 7 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Incorrect numbering of API Terms section

Hello, the "13. API Terms" section is likely incorrectly numbered, given that it is directly after "11. Resolutions and Project Policies" and directly before "13. Termination". The draft version titles it "12. API Terms". Coolclawcat (talk) 04:09, 6 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

 Done thank you! RamzyM (WMF) (talk) 15:30, 6 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Official announcement

I have not seen any official announcement on wikimediafoundation.org and maillist about the updated ToU become effective June 7, 2023. Any announcement will be published? Thanks. SCP-2000 (talk) 01:35, 8 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Great question. A Diff post about what the CC 4.0 piece means to users is being prepared to go out either possibly the week after next. There's a slight wait on that because some of the technical changes for CC4.0 still need to propagate because of server update schedules. That would also be one place the effective date would be mentioned.
I can't fully confirm where-else it may be mentioned. But to try to address @William Graham, I don't think it will be mentioned in a banner or all-user-notification.
Finally, I'll look into your bullet points on "broken" things. It may be one of those things that still hasn't propagated, but just as likely, it may be simple error. I'll investigate within the next day or two. SSpalding (WMF) (talk) 19:55, 8 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Just following on Shaun's note above. Yes, there will be a note going out shortly to wikimediaannounce-l. The community discussion and the draft final update that was proposed for the approvals listed here are also available on meta where we were holding the consultation. - Jrogers (WMF) (talk) 20:48, 8 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

I came here to ask the same question. I noticed page edits on WM projects now state a CC BY-SA 4.0 license. Will there be notifications on all project sites? I will also note some broken things on Commons:

-- William Graham (talk) 01:53, 8 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

None changed content with CC-BY-SA 3.0

Hi

If I create the context under CC-BY-SA 3.0, so the identical content (none change[1]) You don't can share under CC-BY-SA 4.0.

Ok, maybe, You can use the fair-use, but what, when the country is not fair-use?

Are you storing the data in none-fair-use legislative countries?

Dušan Kreheľ

[1] But with append space would be then the adaptation.
Dušan Kreheľ (talk) 10:09, 9 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Dušan Kreheľ: FYI: m:Terms of use/Creative Commons 4.0/Legal note#Mechanism for the upgrade. SCP-2000 (talk) 16:47, 9 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
@SCP-2000: I know. My last edit of page m:User:Dušan_Kreheľ was under CC BY-SA 3.0. So why m:User:Dušan_Kreheľ?export=raw is under CC BY-SA 4.0? That would be under CC BY-SA 3.0. Why not so? You look u de:Wikipedia:Kurier and section "Wenn CC BY-SA 3.0 → CC BY-SA 4.0 verboten ist".
You link write about adaptations, but about none original unchanges pages. Dušan Kreheľ (talk) 17:47, 9 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

[Report] Detect violations of CC BY-SA 3.0 in WMF projects

I would like inform about the report a violation of the CC BY-SA 3.0 license in projects[1] of the WMF Foundation[2]. This state was created by the process of changing the license from CC BY-SA 3.0 to CC BY-SA 4.0. The violation report is available at: https://krehel.sk/Porusovanie_CC_BY-SA_3.0/ (Slovak).

[1] https://www.wikipedia.org/
[2] https://wikimediafoundation.org/

P.S.: The report was reported to legal@wikimedia.org.
Dušan Kreheľ (talk) 21:20, 10 June 2023 (UTC), --Dušan Kreheľ (talk) 07:40, 16 June 2023 (UTC), --Dušan Kreheľ (talk) 07:42, 16 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

See m:Terms of use/Creative Commons 4.0/FAQ#How can we "upgrade" the license?: Revisions of pages before the upgrade to the 4.0 version will continue to be available under the version 3.0 of the license. Tranminh360 (talk) 13:20, 13 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Tranminh360: It is not stated anywhere in writing with the licensed content as far as I know. Dušan Kreheľ (talk) 13:44, 15 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Broken link

I think the link for Robot policy should point to wikitech:Robot policy, wikitech:Robot Policy does not exist. --Ameisenigel (talk) 20:03, 12 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Good catch! Thank you! Link updated. --Gregory Varnum (Wikimedia Foundation) [he/him] (talk) 21:36, 14 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

[Report] Detect violations of GFDL in WMF projects

I would like inform about the report a violation of the GFDL license in projects[1] of the WMF Foundation[2]. The violation report is available at: https://krehel.sk/krehel.sk/Porusovanie_GFDL/ (Slovak).

[1] https://www.wikipedia.org/
[2] https://wikimediafoundation.org/

Dušan Kreheľ (talk) 07:42, 16 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

[Article] Fixing violations of CC BY-SA 3.0 and GFDL licenses" (Slovak)

A new document was created, which is less "legal" and more "practical". It is about "Fixing violations of CC BY-SA 3.0 and GFDL licenses" (Slovak). Dušan Kreheľ (talk) 07:34, 14 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Can we get (or is there already) a redirect to Policy:Terms of Use#paid-contrib-disclosure, which could be handled as an interwiki link from project:Conflict of interest (Q4663309)? Please ping me if replying, I don't maintain a watchlist on this wiki. - Jmabel (talk) 01:53, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply