Resolution:Biographies of living people/ms: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
GVarnum-WMF (talk | contribs) m Removing from Category:Governance wiki using Cat-a-lot Tag: Manual revert |
Updating to match new version of source page |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<languages /> |
|||
{{BLPLang}} |
{{Template:BLPLang}} |
||
{{resolution |
{{resolution |
||
|title =Biografi tokoh hidup |
|||
|title = <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">Biographies of living people</span> |
|||
|notes =Resolusi ini menyatakan pendangan Foundation berkenaan Biografi Tokoh Hidup yang diluluskan pada April 2009. |
|||
|notes = <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">This resolution stating the Foundation's position regarding Biographies of Living Persons was passed in April 2009. It was [[Special:MyLanguage/Resolution:Media about living people|'''amended''']] in November 2013.</span> |
|||
|english = Resolution:Biographies of living people |
|||
|status = passed |
|||
}} |
|||
|year = 2009 |
|||
Wikimedia Foundation mengambil kesempatan ini bagi menegaskan beberapa prinsip dasar yang berkait dengan visi, misi, dan nilai-nilai bersama kita. Salah satu di antara nilai-nilai ini yang sama di antara projek-projek kita adalah keazaman untuk mengekalkan sudut pandang berkecuali. |
|||
}}<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"> |
|||
The Wikimedia Foundation takes this opportunity to reiterate some core principles related to our shared vision, mission, and values. One of these values which is common to all our projects is a commitment to maintaining a neutral point of view. |
|||
</div> |
|||
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"> |
|||
Dalam upaya kita untuk menawarkan sumber pengetahuan yang bernilai dan berguna bagi semua, kita bertanggung jawab untuk menegakkan nilai-nilai tersebut dengan juga memberikan maklumat yang tepat. Peserta dalam projek-projek Wikimedia telah menciptakan sumber yang merangkupi saiz dan bidang yang luas. Seperti yang kami tekankan selama beberapa tahun, sebagai tambahan kuantiti pengetahuan yang ada, kualitinya juga adalah penting. Maklumat berkualiti tinggi di Wikimedia secara umum telah dibuktikan melalui sejumlah kajian, namun ia penting bahawa kita kentiaca cuba untuk bertambah baik. Sebagaimana semua usaha yang membekalkan bahan pendidikan dan maklumat, kesalahan harus dihindari, terutama jika kesalahan tersebut berpotensi merosakkan. Salah satu bahagian di mana ia mungkin terjadi adalah pada penulisan mengenai tokoh yang masih hidup. |
|||
In our efforts to offer a source of knowledge that is valuable and useful to all, we have a responsibility to uphold these values by also providing accurate information. Participants in Wikimedia projects have created resources of vast size and scope. As we have emphasized for several years, in addition to the quantity of knowledge that is available, its quality is also an essential matter. The generally high quality of information in Wikimedia projects has been confirmed by a number of studies, but it is important that we always strive to improve. As with any endeavor that provides educational and informational material, errors need to be avoided, especially when they have the potential to cause harm. One area where this applies is when writing about living people. |
|||
</div> |
|||
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"> |
|||
Rencana-rencana di Wikimedia semakin menjadi keputusan enjin gelintir teratas bagi sebarang carian. Ini bererti apabila penggaji, rakan kerja, rakan, tetangga, atau kenalan mencari mengenai maklumat tantang seseorang, mereka mungkin menjumpainnya di tapak Wikipedia. Ketika projek-projek Wikipedia semakin popular, betitu juga tanggung jawab masyarakat bagi memastikan rencana mengenai tokoh yang masih hidup ini ditulis secara berkecuali, tepat dan mempunyai sumber rujukan yang baik. |
|||
Increasingly, Wikimedia articles are among the top search engine results for just about any query. That means that when a potential employer, a colleague, friend, neighbor or acquaintance looks for information about a person, they may find it at the Wikimedia sites. As the popularity of the Wikimedia projects grows, so does the editing community's responsibility to ensure articles about living people are neutrally-written, accurate and well-sourced. |
|||
</div> |
|||
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"> |
|||
Ketika Wikipedia semakin popular, beberapa isu menjadi semakin menonjol: |
|||
As our popularity has grown, some issues have become more prominent: |
|||
* Ramai orang mencipta rencana yang terlalu bernada promosi: mengenai diri mereka, orang yang mereka kagumi, atau mereka yang dibayar sebagai wakil. Mereka tidak berkecuali, dan tidak ada tempat di projek-projek kita. Secara umum, masyarakat Wikimedia melindungi projek-projek dengan baik dari masalah umum ini dengan menghapus atau memperbaiki hagiografi. |
|||
</div> |
|||
* Sesetengah orang kadang melakukan vandalisme terhadap rencana-rencana mengenai tokoh yang masih hidup. Masyarakat Wikimedia telah mengembangkan perkakasan dan teknik untuk melawan vandalisme tersebut: secara umum hal ini berjalan dengan cukup baik. |
|||
* Beberapa rencana mengenai tokoh yang masih hidup mengandung kesalahan-kesalahan kecil, ditulis dengan buruk, atau memiliki sumber yang lemah. Rencana mengenai tokoh yang tidak terkenal sering terabai, dan cenderung lebih lambat menjadi lebih baik, bahkan tidak sama sekali. |
|||
* Sesetengah orang kadang-kala melakukan suntingan untuk memburuk-burukkan orang lain. Hal ini sukar dikenalpasti atau ditangani, terutama jika penyunting jahat tersebut tekal. |
|||
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"> |
|||
Lembaga Amanah Wikimedia Foundation menggesa masyarakat Wikipedia sejagat untuk menegakkan dan memperkukuh komitmen kita bagi maklumat berkualiti tinggi dan tepat dengan: |
|||
* Many people create articles that are overly promotional in tone: about themselves, people they admire, or those they are paid to represent. These are not neutral, and have no place in our projects. Generally, the Wikimedia community protects the projects well against this common problem by deleting or improving hagiographies. |
|||
* People sometimes vandalize articles about living people. The Wikimedia community has developed tools and techniques for counteracting vandalism: in general they seem to work reasonably well. |
|||
</div> |
|||
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"> |
|||
* Some articles about living people contain small errors, are poorly-written or poorly-sourced. Articles about people who are only marginally well-known are often neglected, and tend to improve much more slowly over time, if at all. |
|||
* People sometimes make edits designed to smear others. This is difficult to identify and counteract, particularly if the malicious editor is persistent. |
|||
</div> |
|||
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"> |
|||
# Memastikan bahwa projek-projek dalam semua bahasa yang menggambarkan tokoh yang masih hidup memiliki polisi bagi memberi perhatian khusus kepada prinsip-prinsip berkecuali dan boleh disahkan bagi rencana-rencana tersebut; |
|||
The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees urges the global Wikimedia community to uphold and strengthen our commitment to high-quality, accurate information, by: |
|||
# Menjaga martabat manusia dan saling hormat bagi privasi peribadi apabila menambah atau menghapuskan maklumat, terutama pada rencana-rencana yang bersifat hangat sementara (efemeral) atau yang memiliki kepentingan terhad (''marginal interest''); |
|||
</div> |
|||
# Menyiasat mekanisma teknik baru bagi menilai suntingan, terutama jika ia menjejaskan orang yang masih hidup, juga bagi memudahkan pembaca melaporkan masaalah; |
|||
# Melayan semua orang yang mengadu mengenai cara mereka digambarkan dalam projek kita dengan sabar, baik, dan hormat, dan menggalakkan orang lain mengambil sikap yang sama. |
|||
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"> |
|||
# Ensuring that projects in all languages that describe living people have policies in place calling for special attention to the principles of neutrality and verifiability in those articles; |
|||
# Taking human dignity and respect for personal privacy into account when adding or removing information, especially in articles of ephemeral or marginal interest; |
|||
</div> |
|||
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"> |
|||
# Investigating new technical mechanisms to assess edits, particularly when they affect living people, and to better enable readers to report problems; |
|||
# Treating any person who has a complaint about how they are described in our projects with patience, kindness, and respect, and encouraging others to do the same. |
|||
</div> |
|||
Revision as of 04:59, 30 September 2023
 | This proposal has been approved by the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees. It may not be circumvented, eroded, or ignored by Wikimedia Foundation officers or staff nor local policies of any Wikimedia project. Please note that in the event of any differences in meaning or interpretation between the original English version of this content and a translation, the original English version takes precedence. |
| ←Resolusi | Biographies of living people | Maklum balas→ |
| This resolution stating the Foundation's position regarding Biographies of Living Persons was passed in April 2009. It was amended in November 2013. |
The Wikimedia Foundation takes this opportunity to reiterate some core principles related to our shared vision, mission, and values. One of these values which is common to all our projects is a commitment to maintaining a neutral point of view.
In our efforts to offer a source of knowledge that is valuable and useful to all, we have a responsibility to uphold these values by also providing accurate information. Participants in Wikimedia projects have created resources of vast size and scope. As we have emphasized for several years, in addition to the quantity of knowledge that is available, its quality is also an essential matter. The generally high quality of information in Wikimedia projects has been confirmed by a number of studies, but it is important that we always strive to improve. As with any endeavor that provides educational and informational material, errors need to be avoided, especially when they have the potential to cause harm. One area where this applies is when writing about living people.
Increasingly, Wikimedia articles are among the top search engine results for just about any query. That means that when a potential employer, a colleague, friend, neighbor or acquaintance looks for information about a person, they may find it at the Wikimedia sites. As the popularity of the Wikimedia projects grows, so does the editing community's responsibility to ensure articles about living people are neutrally-written, accurate and well-sourced.
As our popularity has grown, some issues have become more prominent:
- Many people create articles that are overly promotional in tone: about themselves, people they admire, or those they are paid to represent. These are not neutral, and have no place in our projects. Generally, the Wikimedia community protects the projects well against this common problem by deleting or improving hagiographies.
- People sometimes vandalize articles about living people. The Wikimedia community has developed tools and techniques for counteracting vandalism: in general they seem to work reasonably well.
- Some articles about living people contain small errors, are poorly-written or poorly-sourced. Articles about people who are only marginally well-known are often neglected, and tend to improve much more slowly over time, if at all.
- People sometimes make edits designed to smear others. This is difficult to identify and counteract, particularly if the malicious editor is persistent.
The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees urges the global Wikimedia community to uphold and strengthen our commitment to high-quality, accurate information, by:
- Ensuring that projects in all languages that describe living people have policies in place calling for special attention to the principles of neutrality and verifiability in those articles;
- Taking human dignity and respect for personal privacy into account when adding or removing information, especially in articles of ephemeral or marginal interest;
- Investigating new technical mechanisms to assess edits, particularly when they affect living people, and to better enable readers to report problems;
- Treating any person who has a complaint about how they are described in our projects with patience, kindness, and respect, and encouraging others to do the same.