Resolution:Biographies of living people/sv: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki
Content deleted Content added
m Removing from Category:Governance wiki using Cat-a-lot
Tag: Manual revert
FuzzyBot (talk | contribs)
Updating to match new version of source page
Line 1: Line 1:
<languages />
{{Template:BLPLang}}
{{Template:BLPLang}}
{{resolution/sv
{{resolution
|title = <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">Biographies of living people</span>
|title =Artiklar om nu levande personer
|notes = <span lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">This resolution stating the Foundation's position regarding Biographies of Living Persons was passed in April 2009. It was [[Special:MyLanguage/Resolution:Media about living people|'''amended''']] in November 2013.</span>
|notes =Detta beslut anger Wikimedia Foundations ställning avseende artiklar om nu levande personer vilket antogs i april 2009.
|status = passed
|english =Resolution:Biographies of living people
|year = 2009
}}
}}<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
Wikimedia Foundation tar tillfället i akt att upprepa några grundläggande principer som rör vår gemensamma vision, mål och värderingar. En av dessa värderingar som är gemensam för alla våra projekt är ett ansvar att upprätthålla en neutral synvinkel.
The Wikimedia Foundation takes this opportunity to reiterate some core principles related to our shared vision, mission, and values. One of these values which is common to all our projects is a commitment to maintaining a neutral point of view.
</div>


<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
I vår strävan att erbjuda en källa till kunskap som är värdefull och användbar för alla, har vi ett anvar att upprätthålla dessa värderingar genom att även ge korrekt information. Deltagarna i Wikimedia Foundations projekt har skapat resurser av en enorm storlek och omfattning. Som vi har betonat i många år, utöver den mängd av kunskap som finns tillgänglig, är dess kvalitet även en viktig fråga. Den allmänt höga kvaliteten på informationen i Wikimedia Foundations projekt har bekräftats av ett antal undersökningar, men det är viktigt att vi alltid strävar efter att förbättra den. Som med alla strävan som ger utbildning och informativt material, måste fel undvikas, skärskilt när de har potential att orsaka skada. Ett område där detta gäller är när man skriver om levande personer.
In our efforts to offer a source of knowledge that is valuable and useful to all, we have a responsibility to uphold these values by also providing accurate information. Participants in Wikimedia projects have created resources of vast size and scope. As we have emphasized for several years, in addition to the quantity of knowledge that is available, its quality is also an essential matter. The generally high quality of information in Wikimedia projects has been confirmed by a number of studies, but it is important that we always strive to improve. As with any endeavor that provides educational and informational material, errors need to be avoided, especially when they have the potential to cause harm. One area where this applies is when writing about living people.
</div>


<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
Ökande, ligger Wikimedia Foundations artiklar bland toppen i sökmotorresultaten för i stort sett alla frågor. Detta betyder att när en potentiell bidragsgivare, kollega, vän, granne eller bekant letar efter information om en person, kan de hitta det på Wikimedia Foundations webbplatser. Eftersom Wikimedia Foundations projekts popularitet ökar, så ökar även gemenskapens ansvar att försäkra att artiklar om levande personer är neutralt skrivna, korrekta och väl källbelagda.
Increasingly, Wikimedia articles are among the top search engine results for just about any query. That means that when a potential employer, a colleague, friend, neighbor or acquaintance looks for information about a person, they may find it at the Wikimedia sites. As the popularity of the Wikimedia projects grows, so does the editing community's responsibility to ensure articles about living people are neutrally-written, accurate and well-sourced.
</div>


<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
Eftersom vår popularitet har ökat, har vissa frågor blivit mer framträdande:
As our popularity has grown, some issues have become more prominent:
</div>


<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
* Många personer skapar artiklar som är allt för marknadsförande i tonen: om sig själva, människor de beundrar, eller de som de får betalt att företräda. Dessa är inte neutrala och har ingen plats i våra projekt. Generellt så skyddar Wikimediagemenskapen projekten väl mot detta gemensamma problem genom att radera eller förbättra hagiografier.
* Many people create articles that are overly promotional in tone: about themselves, people they admire, or those they are paid to represent. These are not neutral, and have no place in our projects. Generally, the Wikimedia community protects the projects well against this common problem by deleting or improving hagiographies.
* Personer vandaliserar ibland artiklar om levande personer. Wikimediagemenskapen har utvecklat verktyg och tekniker för att motverka vandalismen: i allmänhet verker de fungera ganska bra.
* People sometimes vandalize articles about living people. The Wikimedia community has developed tools and techniques for counteracting vandalism: in general they seem to work reasonably well.
* Vissa artiklar om levande personer innehåller små fel, är dåligt skrivna eller är dåligt källbelagda. Artiklar om personer som är endast marginellt kända är ofta försummade, och tenderar att förbättras mycket långsamt över tiden, om ens alls.
</div>
* Personer gör ibland redigeringar som syftar till att smutskasta andra. Detta är svårt att identifiera och motverka, skärskilt om den illvillige redigeraren är långlivad.
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
* Some articles about living people contain small errors, are poorly-written or poorly-sourced. Articles about people who are only marginally well-known are often neglected, and tend to improve much more slowly over time, if at all.
* People sometimes make edits designed to smear others. This is difficult to identify and counteract, particularly if the malicious editor is persistent.
</div>


<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
Wikimedia Foundations styrelsemedlemmar uppmanar den globala Wikimediagemenskapen att upprätthålla och stärka vårt engagemang för hög kvalitet och korrekt information genom att:
The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees urges the global Wikimedia community to uphold and strengthen our commitment to high-quality, accurate information, by:
</div>


<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
# Se till att projekten på alla språk som beskriver levande personer har antagit en policy för att kräva skärskild hänsyn till principerna om neutralitet och verifierbarhet i dessa artiklar;
# Ensuring that projects in all languages that describe living people have policies in place calling for special attention to the principles of neutrality and verifiability in those articles;
# Med mänsklig värdighet och respekt för den personliga integriteten i betraktande när du lägger till eller tar bort information, skärskilt i artiklar med kortlivat eller marginellt intresse;
# Taking human dignity and respect for personal privacy into account when adding or removing information, especially in articles of ephemeral or marginal interest;
# Undersöka nya tekniska metoder för att bedöma redigeringar, skärskilt när de berör levande personer, och för att förbättra möjligheten hos läsarna att rapportera problem;
</div>
# Behandla varje person som har ett klagomål om hur de beskrivs i våra projekt med tålamod, vänlighet och respekt, och uppmuntra andra att göra samma sak.
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr">
# Investigating new technical mechanisms to assess edits, particularly when they affect living people, and to better enable readers to report problems;
# Treating any person who has a complaint about how they are described in our projects with patience, kindness, and respect, and encouraging others to do the same.
</div>

Revision as of 05:00, 30 September 2023

Template:BLPLang

Beslut Biographies of living people Respons
This resolution stating the Foundation's position regarding Biographies of Living Persons was passed in April 2009. It was amended in November 2013.

The Wikimedia Foundation takes this opportunity to reiterate some core principles related to our shared vision, mission, and values. One of these values which is common to all our projects is a commitment to maintaining a neutral point of view.

In our efforts to offer a source of knowledge that is valuable and useful to all, we have a responsibility to uphold these values by also providing accurate information. Participants in Wikimedia projects have created resources of vast size and scope. As we have emphasized for several years, in addition to the quantity of knowledge that is available, its quality is also an essential matter. The generally high quality of information in Wikimedia projects has been confirmed by a number of studies, but it is important that we always strive to improve. As with any endeavor that provides educational and informational material, errors need to be avoided, especially when they have the potential to cause harm. One area where this applies is when writing about living people.

Increasingly, Wikimedia articles are among the top search engine results for just about any query. That means that when a potential employer, a colleague, friend, neighbor or acquaintance looks for information about a person, they may find it at the Wikimedia sites. As the popularity of the Wikimedia projects grows, so does the editing community's responsibility to ensure articles about living people are neutrally-written, accurate and well-sourced.

As our popularity has grown, some issues have become more prominent:

  • Many people create articles that are overly promotional in tone: about themselves, people they admire, or those they are paid to represent. These are not neutral, and have no place in our projects. Generally, the Wikimedia community protects the projects well against this common problem by deleting or improving hagiographies.
  • People sometimes vandalize articles about living people. The Wikimedia community has developed tools and techniques for counteracting vandalism: in general they seem to work reasonably well.
  • Some articles about living people contain small errors, are poorly-written or poorly-sourced. Articles about people who are only marginally well-known are often neglected, and tend to improve much more slowly over time, if at all.
  • People sometimes make edits designed to smear others. This is difficult to identify and counteract, particularly if the malicious editor is persistent.

The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees urges the global Wikimedia community to uphold and strengthen our commitment to high-quality, accurate information, by:

  1. Ensuring that projects in all languages that describe living people have policies in place calling for special attention to the principles of neutrality and verifiability in those articles;
  2. Taking human dignity and respect for personal privacy into account when adding or removing information, especially in articles of ephemeral or marginal interest;
  1. Investigating new technical mechanisms to assess edits, particularly when they affect living people, and to better enable readers to report problems;
  2. Treating any person who has a complaint about how they are described in our projects with patience, kindness, and respect, and encouraging others to do the same.