Resolution:Biographies of living people/zh-hans: Difference between revisions
GVarnum-WMF (talk | contribs) Imported translation using page migration |
GVarnum-WMF (talk | contribs) Imported translation using page migration |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
}}维基媒体基金会想借此机会重申一些与我们的共有愿景、任务和价值观相关的核心原则。在这些价值观中，其中有一项适用于我们所有的项目，它是维系中立观点的保证。 |
}}维基媒体基金会想借此机会重申一些与我们的共有愿景、任务和价值观相关的核心原则。在这些价值观中，其中有一项适用于我们所有的项目，它是维系中立观点的保证。 |
||
我们努力提供对所有人都具有价值和用途的知识来源，因此我们也有义务去坚持这些价值观，向读者提供准确的信息。维基媒体项目的参与者创造了规模和范围都极为庞大的资源。数年来我们始终强调：除了知识的数量外，它们的质量同样非常重要。许多研究都已证实维基媒体项目中信息的质量普遍较高，但是我们仍然应该不断地去改善质量。如同在提供教育和新闻材料时应该尽力避免错误，特别是避免可能造成危害的错误一样；在撰写和在世人物有关的内容时也应注意这一点。 |
|||
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"> |
|||
In our efforts to offer a source of knowledge that is valuable and useful to all, we have a responsibility to uphold these values by also providing accurate information. Participants in Wikimedia projects have created resources of vast size and scope. As we have emphasized for several years, in addition to the quantity of knowledge that is available, its quality is also an essential matter. The generally high quality of information in Wikimedia projects has been confirmed by a number of studies, but it is important that we always strive to improve. As with any endeavor that provides educational and informational material, errors need to be avoided, especially when they have the potential to cause harm. One area where this applies is when writing about living people. |
|||
</div> |
|||
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"> |
<div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr"> |
||
Revision as of 09:31, 30 September 2023
 | This proposal has been approved by the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees. It may not be circumvented, eroded, or ignored by Wikimedia Foundation officers or staff nor local policies of any Wikimedia project. Please note that in the event of any differences in meaning or interpretation between the original English version of this content and a translation, the original English version takes precedence. |
| ←Resolutions | 生者传记 | Feedback?→ |
| 本决议表明了基金会对生者传记的态度，于2009年4月获得通过。 |
维基媒体基金会想借此机会重申一些与我们的共有愿景、任务和价值观相关的核心原则。在这些价值观中，其中有一项适用于我们所有的项目，它是维系中立观点的保证。
我们努力提供对所有人都具有价值和用途的知识来源，因此我们也有义务去坚持这些价值观，向读者提供准确的信息。维基媒体项目的参与者创造了规模和范围都极为庞大的资源。数年来我们始终强调：除了知识的数量外，它们的质量同样非常重要。许多研究都已证实维基媒体项目中信息的质量普遍较高，但是我们仍然应该不断地去改善质量。如同在提供教育和新闻材料时应该尽力避免错误，特别是避免可能造成危害的错误一样；在撰写和在世人物有关的内容时也应注意这一点。
Increasingly, Wikimedia articles are among the top search engine results for just about any query. That means that when a potential employer, a colleague, friend, neighbor or acquaintance looks for information about a person, they may find it at the Wikimedia sites. As the popularity of the Wikimedia projects grows, so does the editing community's responsibility to ensure articles about living people are neutrally-written, accurate and well-sourced.
As our popularity has grown, some issues have become more prominent:
- Many people create articles that are overly promotional in tone: about themselves, people they admire, or those they are paid to represent. These are not neutral, and have no place in our projects. Generally, the Wikimedia community protects the projects well against this common problem by deleting or improving hagiographies.
- People sometimes vandalize articles about living people. The Wikimedia community has developed tools and techniques for counteracting vandalism: in general they seem to work reasonably well.
- Some articles about living people contain small errors, are poorly-written or poorly-sourced. Articles about people who are only marginally well-known are often neglected, and tend to improve much more slowly over time, if at all.
- People sometimes make edits designed to smear others. This is difficult to identify and counteract, particularly if the malicious editor is persistent.
The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees urges the global Wikimedia community to uphold and strengthen our commitment to high-quality, accurate information, by:
- Ensuring that projects in all languages that describe living people have policies in place calling for special attention to the principles of neutrality and verifiability in those articles;
- Taking human dignity and respect for personal privacy into account when adding or removing information, especially in articles of ephemeral or marginal interest;
- Investigating new technical mechanisms to assess edits, particularly when they affect living people, and to better enable readers to report problems;
- Treating any person who has a complaint about how they are described in our projects with patience, kindness, and respect, and encouraging others to do the same.