決議: 生者傳記
 | This proposal has been approved by the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees. It may not be circumvented, eroded, or ignored by Wikimedia Foundation officers or staff nor local policies of any Wikimedia project. Please note that in the event of any differences in meaning or interpretation between the original English version of this content and a translation, the original English version takes precedence. |
| ←Resolutions | 生者傳記 | Feedback?→ |
| 本決議表明了基金會對生者傳記的態度，於2009年4月獲得通過。 |
維基媒體基金會想藉此機會重申一些與我們的共有願景、任務和價值觀相關的核心原則。在這些價值觀中，其中有一項適用於我們所有的計畫，它是維繫中立觀點的保證。
我們努力提供對所有人都具有價值和用途的知識來源，因此我們也有義務去堅持這些價值觀，向讀者提供準確的資訊。維基媒體計畫的參與者創造了規模和範圍都極為龐大的資源。數年來我們始終強調：除了知識的數量外，它們的質量同樣非常重要。許多研究都已證實維基媒體計畫中資訊的質量普遍較高，但是我們仍然應該不斷地去改善質量。如同在提供教育和新聞材料時應該儘力避免錯誤，特別是避免可能造成危害的錯誤一樣；在撰寫和在世人物有關的內容時也應注意這一點。
Increasingly, Wikimedia articles are among the top search engine results for just about any query. That means that when a potential employer, a colleague, friend, neighbor or acquaintance looks for information about a person, they may find it at the Wikimedia sites. As the popularity of the Wikimedia projects grows, so does the editing community's responsibility to ensure articles about living people are neutrally-written, accurate and well-sourced.
As our popularity has grown, some issues have become more prominent:
- Many people create articles that are overly promotional in tone: about themselves, people they admire, or those they are paid to represent. These are not neutral, and have no place in our projects. Generally, the Wikimedia community protects the projects well against this common problem by deleting or improving hagiographies.
- People sometimes vandalize articles about living people. The Wikimedia community has developed tools and techniques for counteracting vandalism: in general they seem to work reasonably well.
- Some articles about living people contain small errors, are poorly-written or poorly-sourced. Articles about people who are only marginally well-known are often neglected, and tend to improve much more slowly over time, if at all.
- People sometimes make edits designed to smear others. This is difficult to identify and counteract, particularly if the malicious editor is persistent.
The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees urges the global Wikimedia community to uphold and strengthen our commitment to high-quality, accurate information, by:
- Ensuring that projects in all languages that describe living people have policies in place calling for special attention to the principles of neutrality and verifiability in those articles;
- Taking human dignity and respect for personal privacy into account when adding or removing information, especially in articles of ephemeral or marginal interest;
- Investigating new technical mechanisms to assess edits, particularly when they affect living people, and to better enable readers to report problems;
- Treating any person who has a complaint about how they are described in our projects with patience, kindness, and respect, and encouraging others to do the same.