Resolution:Licensing policy/fr
 | Cette politique a été approuvée par le Conseil d’administration de la Fondation Wikimedia. Elle ne peut être contournée, réduite ou ignorée par les responsables ou le personnel de la Fondation Wikimedia, ni par les politiques locales de tout Projet Wikimedia. |
Définitions utiles
- Projet
- Un projet spécifique de la Fondation Wikimedia dans une langue en particulier, ou un projet plurilingue. Exemples concrets : Wikipédia en anglais, Wikisource en français, Meta.
- Licence de contenu libre
- Une licence en accord avec les termes de la Définition d'oeuvres culturelles libres spécifique aux licences, comme on peut la trouver sur http://freedomdefined.org/Definition , version 1.0.
- Politique de Doctrine d'Exemption (PDE)
- Une politique spécifique à chaque projet, en accord avec les lois américaines et celles des pays où le contenu du projet est le plus consulté (s'il y en a), qui reconnaît les limitations du droit d'auteur (jurisprudences incluses), applicable au projet, et qui permet l'upload de matériaux sous droit d'auteur qui peuvent être légalement utilisés dans le contexte du projet, indépendamment du statut de leur licence. Exemples concrets : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fair_use et http://pl.wikinews.org/wiki/Wikinews:Dozwolony_u%C5%BCytek
Resolution
Whereas the mission of the Wikimedia Foundation is to "empower and engage people around the world to collect and develop educational content under a free content license,"
- All projects are expected to host only content which is under a Free Content License, or which is otherwise free as recognized by the 'Definition of Free Cultural Works' as referenced above.
- In addition, with the exception of Wikimedia Commons, each project community may develop and adopt an EDP. Non-free content used under an EDP must be identified in a machine-readable format so that it can be easily identified by users of the site as well as re-users.
- Such EDPs must be minimal. Their use, with limited exception, should be to illustrate historically significant events, to include identifying protected works such as logos, or to complement (within narrow limits) articles about copyrighted contemporary works. An EDP may not allow material where we can reasonably expect someone to upload a freely licensed file for the same purpose, such as is the case for almost all portraits of living notable individuals. Any content used under an EDP must be replaced with a freely licensed work whenever one is available which will serve the same educational purpose.
- Media used under EDPs are subject to deletion if they lack an applicable rationale. They must be used only in the context of other freely licensed content.
- For the projects which currently have an EDP in place, the following action shall be taken:
- As of March 23, 2007, all new media uploaded under unacceptable licenses (as defined above) and lacking an exemption rationale should be deleted, and existing media under such licenses should go through a discussion process where it is determined whether such a rationale exists; if not, they should be deleted as well.
- For the projects which currently do not have an EDP in place, the following action shall be taken:
- As of March 23, 2007, any newly uploaded files under an unacceptable license shall be deleted.
- The Foundation resolves to assist all project communities who wish to develop an EDP with their process of developing it.
By March 23, 2008, all existing files under an unacceptable license as per the above must either be accepted under an EDP, or shall be deleted.
Passed with 7 supporting, 23 March 2007.