Wikimedia talk:Babel: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m random thoughts + link |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
<center>[{{SERVER}}{{localurl:Wikimedia:Babel|action=edit§ion=new}} In principium erat verbum]</center> |
<center>[{{SERVER}}{{localurl:Wikimedia:Babel|action=edit§ion=new}} In principium erat verbum]</center> |
||
== Update requests |
== Update requests == |
||
''or Todo ;-) '' |
''or Todo ;-) '' |
||
;15:22, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
|||
;Update requests |
;Update requests |
||
*Sitemap +Benefactors Cs, De, Es, Id |
*Sitemap +Benefactors Cs, De, Es, Id |
||
| Line 17: | Line 19: | ||
[[User:Aphaia|Aphaea]] 15:22, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
[[User:Aphaia|Aphaea]] 15:22, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
||
For minor update, use [[Translation requests/quick translation]]. |
|||
== Site navigation == |
== Site navigation == |
||
Revision as of 06:18, 16 April 2005
"Neutral point of view can be realized by juxtaposition of opposite thoughts." -- anonymous
Update requests
or Todo ;-)
- 15
- 22, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- Update requests
- Sitemap +Benefactors Cs, De, Es, Id
- Synch requests
- Home Ja, Ko, Ro
- Benefactors; synch to En (need announce on meta TR)
Aphaea 15:22, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
For minor update, use Translation requests/quick translation.
Honestly saying Wikimania site has better navigations than us. --- how do you think ? I am stronly ostinated by a thought non-English pages should have two kinds of navigation templates: one for interlang, one for all major pages in that language. But I have no idea what kind of dispositions will be best. (Top, side, or bottom ...) --Aphaea 19:29, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)