Talk:Staff and contractors: Difference between revisions
→Fellowship recipients: new section |
m agree |
||
Line 16:
I think Fellowship recipients ought to be moved to a separate page. Calling them "staff" seems odd and wrong. Thoughts? --[[User:MZMcBride|MZMcBride]] 02:09, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
:I agree. Also, the UX section ought to be merged into the Tech section (and some positions updated) since there are no longer any "UX programs". [[User:Guillom|guillom]] 16:06, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
|
Revision as of 16:06, 8 October 2010
General inquiries are welcome at m:Foundation wiki feedback. If you would like to help translate this page, visit m:Translation_requests/WMF/Current_staff.
Should it be noted that Jimmy is indeed not a staff member, and that his omission is not an oversight? I'm sure most viewers (and contributors) have the impression that he is indeed a WMF staff member. -- Zanimum 12:52, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk at Meta?
Shouldn't this talk page contain a link to a talk page on Meta, where its content can be discussed? Although this page is probably not "written by the community" I think we could provide some useful input at times. // habj 17:29, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Rename page?
I'm not really sure why this page is called "Current staff"; I suggest renaming it to simply "Staff". Any other opinions?--Eloquence 21:39, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- Sure, it sounds better and will also look better at the same time :) E 07:14, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Fellowship recipients
I think Fellowship recipients ought to be moved to a separate page. Calling them "staff" seems odd and wrong. Thoughts? --MZMcBride 02:09, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
- I agree. Also, the UX section ought to be merged into the Tech section (and some positions updated) since there are no longer any "UX programs". guillom 16:06, 8 October 2010 (UTC)