Policy talk:Privacy policy: Difference between revisions
→MKALAMA POND AT DODOMA: new section |
m Reverted changes by 197.250.99.39 (talk) to last version by SA 13 Bro |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
Please comment so that we can determine the consensus of the Wikipedia community on this matter. --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 21:39, 10 June 2017 (UTC) |
Please comment so that we can determine the consensus of the Wikipedia community on this matter. --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 21:39, 10 June 2017 (UTC) |
||
== MKALAMA POND AT DODOMA == |
|||
Mkalama pond is the fresh water pond located at Ntyuka in Dodoma region constructed in 1942 for the main purpose of water supplies in domestic activities such as cooking, drinking, etc. During that time when the pond established, water was not drying. But in recent years the water tends to fall up to drought according to poor managements of the pond. The level of water drop due to overgrazing and increasing in population that depends on the pond for the activities. The pond was surrounded by indigenous residence of humans who carry out different social activities such as crop cultivation, livestock keeping and irrigation. The ecology of the pond was consist of different species of both fauna and flora which interact in their aquatic ecosystem in various ways such as feeding relationship, recycling of natural and man-made materials as well as in energy flow in the ecological system. |
Revision as of 15:13, 24 August 2017
Template:Archive box auto User:MiszaBot/config
Out of sync
{{editrequest}}
This page is missing the summary seen currently at https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Privacy_policy .
caused by a move? --Elvey (talk) 06:06, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
- I see it correctly. It was fixed after that page move. Matiia (talk) 05:33, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Enforcement
Who is responsible for enforcement of this policy. Regards, —Neotarf (talk) 18:17, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Ultimately, the relevant law enforcement authorities for privacy and/or contracts. http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/bodies/authorities/index_en.htm has some useful directories. Nemo 19:35, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
- Interesting. There is also this--California seems to be very forward-thinking. But many people would prefer to go through channels internally, if one can only figure out what they are. —Neotarf (talk) 20:19, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Data centers in U.S.
«servers and data centers located in the U.S.»
Is this phrase OK? I know that Wikimedia servers are also in Europe. --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 21:27, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Replyto, there are caching centres around the world, but these are widely regarded as 'temporary' storage, much like throwing some bytes over a line, it is a 'transitory' element and the legal framework for those types of connections is much more permissible around the world. Basically, their only function is to 'speedup' access, but we could do without them as well. The foundation's primary servers however are housed in the US. This is where the data is 'hosted'. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 12:32, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
RfC Announce: Wikimedia referrer policy
In February of 2016 the Wikimedia foundation started sending information to all of the websites we link to that allow the owner of the website (or someone who hacks the website, or law enforcement with a search warrant / subpoena) to figure out what Wikipedia page the user was reading when they clicked on the external link.
The WMF is not bound by Wikipedia RfCs, but we can use an advisory-only RfC to decide what information, if any, we want to send to websites we link to and then put in a request to the WMF. I have posted such an advisory-only RfC, which may be found here:
en:Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/RfC: Wikimedia referrer policy
Please comment so that we can determine the consensus of the Wikipedia community on this matter. --Guy Macon (talk) 21:39, 10 June 2017 (UTC)