Resolution:Licensing policy/sr
 | Ovu politiku je odobrio Odbor poverenika Zadužbine Vikimedije Ona se ne može zaobilaziti, erodirati ili ignorisati od strane činovnika ili zaposlenih u Vikimediji, kao ni lokalnih pravila bilo kog Vikimedijinog projekta. |
Primenljive definicije
- Projekat
- Pojedinačni projekat Zadužbine Vikimedija na određenom jeziku ili višejezički projekat, kao što je Vikipedija na engleskom, Vikizvornik na francuskom ili Meta.
- Licenca za slobodni sadržaj
- Licenca koja ispunjava uslove Definicije slodobnih kulturnih radova koji se odnose na licence, kao što je izloženo na https://freedomdefined.org/Definition/1.0 verzija 1.0.
- Politika doktrine izuzetaka (PDI)
- Politika specifična za projekat, usklađena sa zakonima Sjedinjenih Država i zakonima zemlje iz koje se najviše pristupa sadržaju (ako takva postoji), koja prepoznaje ograničenja zakona o autorskom pravu (uključujući i procesno pravo) na način primenljiv na projektu, i dozvoljava slanje materijala koji su zaštićeni autorskim pravom a koji se mogu legalno koristiti u kontekstu projekta, bez obzira na status autorskog prava nad njima. Primeri uključuju Wikipedia:Fair use i pl:Wikinews:Dozwolony użytek.
Rezolucija
Whereas the mission of the Wikimedia Foundation is to "empower and engage people around the world to collect and develop educational content under a free content license,"
- All projects are expected to host only content which is under a Free Content License, or which is otherwise free as recognized by the 'Definition of Free Cultural Works' as referenced above.
- In addition, with the exception of Wikimedia Commons, each project community may develop and adopt an EDP. Non-free content used under an EDP must be identified in a machine-readable format so that it can be easily identified by users of the site as well as re-users.
- Such EDPs must be minimal. Their use, with limited exception, should be to illustrate historically significant events, to include identifying protected works such as logos, or to complement (within narrow limits) articles about copyrighted contemporary works. An EDP may not allow material where we can reasonably expect someone to upload a freely licensed file for the same purpose, such as is the case for almost all portraits of living notable individuals. Any content used under an EDP must be replaced with a freely licensed work whenever one is available which will serve the same educational purpose.
- Media used under EDPs are subject to deletion if they lack an applicable rationale. They must be used only in the context of other freely licensed content.
- For the projects which currently have an EDP in place, the following action shall be taken:
- As of March 23, 2007, all new media uploaded under unacceptable licenses (as defined above) and lacking an exemption rationale should be deleted, and existing media under such licenses should go through a discussion process where it is determined whether such a rationale exists; if not, they should be deleted as well.
- For the projects which currently do not have an EDP in place, the following action shall be taken:
- As of March 23, 2007, any newly uploaded files under an unacceptable license shall be deleted.
- The Foundation resolves to assist all project communities who wish to develop an EDP with their process of developing it.
By March 23, 2008, all existing files under an unacceptable license as per the above must either be accepted under an EDP, or shall be deleted.
Passed with 7 supporting, 23 March 2007.