Template talk:OurProjects: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki
Latest comment: 4 months ago by Quiddity (WMF) in topic Wikifunctions
Content deleted Content added
Shouldn't this template include meta?
 
m {{talk header}}
Tag: 2017 source edit
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User:LincolnBot/archiveconfig
|archive = Template talk:OurProjects/Archive %(counter)d
|algo = old(180d)
|counter = 1
|maxarchivesize = 150K
|archiveheader = {{talk archive}}
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|minthreadsleft = 3
}}{{talk header}}
==Meta==
==Meta==
Shouldn't this template include [[m:|meta]]? –[[User:NWilson (WMF)|NWilson (WMF)]] ([[User talk:NWilson (WMF)|talk]]) 22:02, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Shouldn't this template include [[m:|meta]]? –[[User:NWilson (WMF)|NWilson (WMF)]] ([[User talk:NWilson (WMF)|talk]]) 22:02, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
:Hello Quiddity, and congratulations on your new position at the WMF! In reply to your question, it could, but we would need to change the format from a simple rectangle because 13 is a prime number. If you can either think of a new layout or add some more projects (incubator, wikitech), then it could work. Maybe If you do so, you should update [[m:Template:OurProjects]] and collect translations (e.g., [[Template:OurProjects-de]]) as well. Regards, [[User:PiRSquared17|PiRSquared17]] ([[User talk:PiRSquared17|talk]]) 23:43, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
::Thank you!
::I had briefly checked the history, and saw an incremental addition, but now I see that it was only [https://wikimediafoundation.org/w/index.php?title=Template:OurProjects&diff=87505&oldid=84238 at 11 projects] for 3 weeks, until [https://wikimediafoundation.org/w/index.php?title=Template:OurProjects&diff=next&oldid=87622 MediaWiki was added].
::The layout should be changed anyway, because HTML tables are not a recommended design tool, but I'm out of practice (and date) with CSS, so I'll pass the buck. [[User:NWilson (WMF)|NWilson (WMF)]] ([[User talk:NWilson (WMF)|talk]]) 20:37, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
:::Do you think we should collect translations? I didn't notice that it used to use a non-rectangular pattern. Maybe I can help with CSS, but there are more experienced people. [[User:PiRSquared17|PiRSquared17]] ([[User talk:PiRSquared17|talk]]) 23:38, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
: Maybe. But in addition to the layout issue mentioned above, this template is an attachment to [[our projects]], of course. The two should be kept in-sync and we've previously established that we should only include content projects, not internal projects (I think). We could add Labs and Meta-Wiki to sync with https://www.wikimedia.org, maybe. It seems like one of those situations where changing any small piece is going to create a lot of work. :-) --[[User:MZMcBride|MZMcBride]] ([[User talk:MZMcBride|talk]]) 23:50, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
::If we do this, we should probably add Incubator too, which is somewhere between a content project and a backstage project. [[User:PiRSquared17|PiRSquared17]] ([[User talk:PiRSquared17|talk]]) 01:03, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

== Wikifunctions ==

Add new sister project, Wikifunctions. [[User:Wargo|Wargo]] ([[User talk:Wargo|talk]]) 18:43, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

:This appears to have [https://foundation.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:OurProjects&diff=prev&oldid=287011 been done in October], and was marked for translation right after so should have been visible immediately - Let us know if there are problems displaying it somewhere/somehow? Otherwise, thanks for the note! [[User:Quiddity (WMF)|Quiddity (WMF)]] ([[User talk:Quiddity (WMF)|talk]]) 00:07, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:42, 16 March 2024

Meta

Shouldn't this template include meta? –NWilson (WMF) (talk) 22:02, 6 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello Quiddity, and congratulations on your new position at the WMF! In reply to your question, it could, but we would need to change the format from a simple rectangle because 13 is a prime number. If you can either think of a new layout or add some more projects (incubator, wikitech), then it could work. Maybe If you do so, you should update m:Template:OurProjects and collect translations (e.g., Template:OurProjects-de) as well. Regards, PiRSquared17 (talk) 23:43, 6 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thank you!
I had briefly checked the history, and saw an incremental addition, but now I see that it was only at 11 projects for 3 weeks, until MediaWiki was added.
The layout should be changed anyway, because HTML tables are not a recommended design tool, but I'm out of practice (and date) with CSS, so I'll pass the buck. NWilson (WMF) (talk) 20:37, 7 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
Do you think we should collect translations? I didn't notice that it used to use a non-rectangular pattern. Maybe I can help with CSS, but there are more experienced people. PiRSquared17 (talk) 23:38, 7 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
Maybe. But in addition to the layout issue mentioned above, this template is an attachment to our projects, of course. The two should be kept in-sync and we've previously established that we should only include content projects, not internal projects (I think). We could add Labs and Meta-Wiki to sync with https://www.wikimedia.org, maybe. It seems like one of those situations where changing any small piece is going to create a lot of work. :-) --MZMcBride (talk) 23:50, 7 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
If we do this, we should probably add Incubator too, which is somewhere between a content project and a backstage project. PiRSquared17 (talk) 01:03, 8 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wikifunctions

Add new sister project, Wikifunctions. Wargo (talk) 18:43, 26 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

This appears to have been done in October, and was marked for translation right after so should have been visible immediately - Let us know if there are problems displaying it somewhere/somehow? Otherwise, thanks for the note! Quiddity (WMF) (talk) 00:07, 6 January 2024 (UTC)Reply