User talk:AP295: Difference between revisions

From Wikimedia Foundation Governance Wiki
Latest comment: 1 month ago by AP295 in topic thank you
Content deleted Content added
→‎thank you: new section
AP295 (talk | contribs)
Line 2: Line 2:


Thanks for spotting [[META:Requests for comment/Violating the Neutral point of view in Arabic Wiki]]. It'll take me a while to read, but I am curious if you are going to be posting this topic on the [[Policy talk:Universal Code of Conduct|ucoc discussion here at foundation]]. Unfortunately I am blocked at META (and many others too) so cannot participate in discussions there. [[User:Ottawahitech|Ottawahitech]] ([[User talk:Ottawahitech|talk]]) 23:53, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for spotting [[META:Requests for comment/Violating the Neutral point of view in Arabic Wiki]]. It'll take me a while to read, but I am curious if you are going to be posting this topic on the [[Policy talk:Universal Code of Conduct|ucoc discussion here at foundation]]. Unfortunately I am blocked at META (and many others too) so cannot participate in discussions there. [[User:Ottawahitech|Ottawahitech]] ([[User talk:Ottawahitech|talk]]) 23:53, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

:: "''but I am curious if you are going to be posting this topic on the ucoc discussion here at foundation.''" Why would I do that? I didn't post the RFC to begin with, I only obliged the request for comments. Being somewhat tired at the moment, I'm struggling to come up with a glib summary of the RfC for you. The complaint against arwiki is more than a bit loony, and that's putting it charitably. ''Morally bankrupt'' is the phrase that comes to mind, though with the proviso that I cannot read Arabic. [[User:AP295|AP295]] ([[User talk:AP295|talk]]) 16:41, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:41, 11 March 2024

thank you

Thanks for spotting META:Requests for comment/Violating the Neutral point of view in Arabic Wiki. It'll take me a while to read, but I am curious if you are going to be posting this topic on the ucoc discussion here at foundation. Unfortunately I am blocked at META (and many others too) so cannot participate in discussions there. Ottawahitech (talk) 23:53, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

"but I am curious if you are going to be posting this topic on the ucoc discussion here at foundation." Why would I do that? I didn't post the RFC to begin with, I only obliged the request for comments. Being somewhat tired at the moment, I'm struggling to come up with a glib summary of the RfC for you. The complaint against arwiki is more than a bit loony, and that's putting it charitably. Morally bankrupt is the phrase that comes to mind, though with the proviso that I cannot read Arabic. AP295 (talk) 16:41, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply