User talk:AP295: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 16:53, 11 March 2024

thank you

Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Thanks for spotting META:Requests for comment/Violating the Neutral point of view in Arabic Wiki. It'll take me a while to read, but I am curious if you are going to be posting this topic on the ucoc discussion here at foundation. Unfortunately I am blocked at META (and many others too) so cannot participate in discussions there. Ottawahitech (talk) 23:53, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

"but I am curious if you are going to be posting this topic on the ucoc discussion here at foundation." Why would I do that? I didn't post the RFC to begin with, I only obliged the request for comments. Being somewhat tired at the moment, I'm struggling to come up with a glib summary of the RfC for you. The complaint against arwiki is more than a bit loony, and that's putting it charitably. Morally bankrupt is the phrase that comes to mind, though with the proviso that I cannot read Arabic. I suppose I should say something about it in the policy discussion though. A few editors in the RfC have dolled out the usual round of thought-terminating clichés. I don't mean to make it look like that's stopping me. Rather, I haven't the energy for it right at the moment. AP295 (talk) 16:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Revision as of 16:41, 11 March 2024 view source AP295 (talk \| contribs) 79 edits →‎thank you: Reply Tag: Reply ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:53, 11 March 2024 view source AP295 (talk \| contribs) 79 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Thanks for spotting [[META:Requests for comment/Violating the Neutral point of view in Arabic Wiki]]. It'll take me a while to read, but I am curious if you are going to be posting this topic on the [[Policy talk:Universal Code of Conduct\|ucoc discussion here at foundation]]. Unfortunately I am blocked at META (and many others too) so cannot participate in discussions there. [[User:Ottawahitech\|Ottawahitech]] ([[User talk:Ottawahitech\|talk]]) 23:53, 10 March 2024 (UTC)		Thanks for spotting [[META:Requests for comment/Violating the Neutral point of view in Arabic Wiki]]. It'll take me a while to read, but I am curious if you are going to be posting this topic on the [[Policy talk:Universal Code of Conduct\|ucoc discussion here at foundation]]. Unfortunately I am blocked at META (and many others too) so cannot participate in discussions there. [[User:Ottawahitech\|Ottawahitech]] ([[User talk:Ottawahitech\|talk]]) 23:53, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

	:: "''but I am curious if you are going to be posting this topic on the ucoc discussion here at foundation.''" Why would I do that? I didn't post the RFC to begin with, I only obliged the request for comments. Being somewhat tired at the moment, I'm struggling to come up with a glib summary of the RfC for you. The complaint against arwiki is more than a bit loony, and that's putting it charitably. ''Morally bankrupt'' is the phrase that comes to mind, though with the proviso that I cannot read Arabic. [[User:AP295\|AP295]] ([[User talk:AP295\|talk]]) 16:41, 11 March 2024 (UTC)		: "''but I am curious if you are going to be posting this topic on the ucoc discussion here at foundation.''" Why would I do that? I didn't post the RFC to begin with, I only obliged the request for comments. Being somewhat tired at the moment, I'm struggling to come up with a glib summary of the RfC for you. The complaint against arwiki is more than a bit loony, and that's putting it charitably. ''Morally bankrupt'' is the phrase that comes to mind, though with the proviso that I cannot read Arabic. I suppose I should say ''something'' about it in the policy discussion though. A few editors in the RfC have dolled out the usual round of thought-terminating clichés. I don't mean to make it look like that's stopping me. Rather, I haven't the energy for it right at the moment. [[User:AP295\|AP295]] ([[User talk:AP295\|talk]]) 16:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)